Visit Logs

General discussion about trigpoints, the TrigpointingUK website etc
Post Reply
ted1
Posts: 30
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2025 10:33 am

Visit Logs

Post by ted1 »

The trigpointing home page shows that the total number of visit logs
is currently 483184. 500000 is not far away (or 524288 if you prefer 2^19 :)

So... how to identify the half-millionth log, given that the log number
shown in a URL is different (maybe includes deleted logs?)

Any guesses as to when? My random selection is 1 May.
User avatar
Teasel
Posts: 102
Joined: Sat May 31, 2014 10:11 am
Location: Needingworth
Contact:

Re: Visit Logs

Post by Teasel »

Sadly, the log_id in the URL reflects not just deleted logs representing actual interaction by actual trig baggers, but also cleanups after various hacking attempts. So https://trigpointing.uk/logs/500000 reflects not only on the site's success, but also its vulnerabilities to randomly annoying scroats with nothing better to do. (Sorry Brian M!)

By its nature, it's always going to be somewhat arbitrary. However, if you're willing to accept it potentially changing over time, then an API call to https://api.trigpointing.uk/v1/logs?ord ... kip=399999, with the 3 changed to a 4, will show the 500,000'th currently valid log in the database.

I'm not going to be brave enough / tempt fate enough to guess a date! Total logs per month and total active users have noticeably increased since the rewrite. However logs per month from "power users" with >300 visits already logged is significantly down. (Which is very concerning, but aligns with various negative posts on this forum and emails from frustrated "community figures" I have received. Constructive criticism / forward-looking suggestions most welcome!)

Maybe there should be some sort of reward? Perhaps a customised Trigfig for the first person to have the 500000th valid log?(*) And another for the first person to have the 500000th valid photo (though that's a bit further off)?

(*) yes, the API is open and documented; yes, that makes it trivial to write an exploit script to ensure you're the 500,000th; no that won't get you a Trigfig, though it might well get you a ban!
asbown
Posts: 17
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2014 10:34 pm

Re: Visit Logs

Post by asbown »

Its a shame when people are negative about a resource that's free to use and to me and many more invaluable, I admit the new look website took me a time to suss out but I love it now, I'm thinking September time for the 500000 log, 1 thing I can't work out is how to get passive stations only, is there away anybody knows??
ted1
Posts: 30
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2025 10:33 am

Re: Visit Logs

Post by ted1 »

Hi Andy,

> how to get passive stations only,

Not sure how to do this in T:UK but its possible via the OS page:
https://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/geodes ... egacy-data
which lets you specify a search location, number of nearest matches
then save the results as a csv file.
User avatar
Teasel
Posts: 102
Joined: Sat May 31, 2014 10:11 am
Location: Needingworth
Contact:

Re: Visit Logs

Post by Teasel »

There's a bit of overlap between "Passive stations" and "Non-pillar stations".

If you just want a list of bolts, blocks, berntsens etc, then the "Trigpoint types" filter on the current map page and trigs list pages will let you filter out pillars, fbms, intersecteds and actives, leaving only "Survey marks".
If you find yourself making the same filter choices all the time, eg you love / hate intersecteds, the preferences page allows you to choose your preferred defaults.

If you genuinely mean entries in the OS Passive Station Database, then the only way to do this at present is via the experimental Trigs v2 page. Click the "Recent use" filter and deselect everything except "Passive station".
In time, I hope to make this page the default for trigpoint lists, so any feedback is most welcome.
asbown
Posts: 17
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2014 10:34 pm

Re: Visit Logs

Post by asbown »

Thanks Ted, I have done that, just need to work out how to spilt the list into those I still need to log.

Ian, I have had a go and that works, It would be lovely if we could somehow get it on to a interactive map
Post Reply